CIPS L4M1 問題集

質問 1：
Describe regulation that govern the Public Sectors and explain how this may impact upon procurement activities (25 marks).
正解：
See the solution in Explanation part below.
Explanation:
How to approach this question
- You do need to know some legislation for public sector here. This may be difficult if you don't work in the Public Sector. If you're struggling with this, you could also talk about general legislation that governs all types of organisations such as the Equalities Act and Modern Slavery Act.
- This is also a tough question if you're not British. CIPS is a UK based organisation and the syllabus therefore only talks about British legislation. If you're in a different country you could talk about the legislation in your own country, providing the question doesn't specifically mention UK Law.
- Either way I would recommend knowing a couple of pieces of British Legislation. You don't need to be an expert but just state what they are and what the purpose is should be enough to get you a pass.
Example essay
The public sector, which encompasses various governmental and state-owned enterprises, plays a pivotal role in the governance and provision of essential services. This sector operates under a strict framework of regulations and policies, ensuring that its operations are fair, transparent, and accountable. Among the most critical aspects of these operations is procurement, the process through which the public sector acquires goods, services, and works. This essay will explain key regulations governing the public sector, focusing on the Public Contracts Regulations (PCR) 2015, Late Payment Regulations 2016, Equalities Act2010, and Public Services (Social Value) Act 2012, and explores how these regulations impact procurement activities.
The Public Contracts Regulations (PCR) 2015
The PCR 2015 plays a foundational role in public sector procurement in the UK. It sets out the procedures for procuring contracts, aiming to ensure fairness and transparency in the process. The regulations mandate that all procurement processes must be conducted in a manner that prevents discrimination and allows equal access to potential contractors, regardless of their size or location. For example, the open tendering process under PCR 2015 has enabled a more diverse range of companies, including small and medium-sized enterprises, to participate in government contracts, enhancing competition and innovation. The four 'pillars' of the PCR are derived from EU Procurement Directives and are: non-discrimination, free movement of goods, equality of treatment and transparency.
Late Payment Regulations 2013
The Late Payment Regulations 2013 address a critical aspect of procurement: the timely payment for goods and services. This regulation ensures that public sector organizations pay their suppliers within a stipulated time frame, significantly impacting the financial stability of these suppliers. For instance, the regulation has been particularly beneficial for small businesses that rely on prompt payments to maintain cash flow. The introduction of these regulations has improved the trust between public sector entities and their suppliers, leading to more efficient procurement processes.
Equalities Act 2010
The Equalities Act 2010 is another crucial piece of legislation impacting public sector procurement. This Act prohibits discrimination in the workplace and in the provision of services, extending its influence to the procurement process. Public sector entities must ensure that their procurement decisions do not discriminate against any group and that they promote equality. For instance, when a public sector organization issues a tender, it must ensure that the selection criteria do not unfairly disadvantage any potential supplier based on irrelevant characteristics. This approach not only fosters a more inclusive procurement environment but also helps to tap into a wider talent and supplier pool, enhancing the quality and effectiveness of public services.
Public Services (Social Value) Act 2012
The Public Services (Social Value) Act 2012 marks a significant shift in how procurement is approached in the public sector. This Act requires public sector organizations to consider how the services they procure can improve the economic, social, and environmental well-being of their area. This means that when a public sector entity procures goods or services, it must consider factors beyond just the price and quality. For example, a local government might prioritize suppliers who can demonstrate a commitment to environmental sustainability or who offer employment opportunities to local residents. This approach to procurement encourages a more holistic view of value for money, factoring in the wider impact of procurement decisions on society.
Public Accountability and Freedom of Information Requests
In addition to these specific regulations, the concept of public accountability and the mechanism of Freedom of Information requests play a crucial role in the public sector, especially in procurement activities. Public accountability ensures that entities are answerable to the public and their actions are transparent. Freedom of Information requests enable individuals and organizations to access information held by public authorities, which includes details of procurement decisions and contracts. This transparency is critical in ensuring that procurement activities are conducted ethically and responsibly, deterring corruption and mismanagement.
In conclusion, the regulation of the public sector, particularly in the realm of procurement, are complex.
Regulations such as the PCR 2015, Late Payment Regulations 2016, Equalities Act 2010, and the Public Services (Social Value) Act 2012, along with the principles of public accountability and transparency, ensure that procurement activities are conducted in a fair, transparent, and socially responsible manner. These regulations not only safeguard the interests of suppliers, especially smaller businesses, but also ensure that the public sector remains a model of integrity and efficiency and that taxpayers' money is well spent.
Tutor Notes
- Okay this is important: The PCR 2015 regulations are being rescinded in 2024. They're based on EU Law and the UK has left the EU. I know we left a while ago now but it's taken us a long time to address the issue and figure out what we want to do about it. There was also a pandemic that got in the way of people making any decisions in parliament that weren't to do with Covid. The PCR 2015 will be replaced in late 2024 with new 'British' rather than European rules.
- At the time of writing this (December 2023) we don't 100% know what the new rules are going to look like and if you're taking this exam from November 2024 onwards, I recommend doing a bit of research into the new regulations.
- Now the complicated bit- the CIPS syllabus is valid from 2024-2028 and doesn't address that legislation is changing. I therefore don't really know what they're going to expect when students are taking this exam and the study guide information is out of date. If you're not working in the Public Sector, how are you to know the legislation has changed?
- My advice is this- briefly learn PCR 2015- the four pillars in particular, and when the new legislation comes out, have a quick google and see if these pillars are still the same. The regs aren't going to change THAT much - things like transparency and equal treatment are still going to be really important, but there may be some slight language changes. Plus, if you're able to mention in an essay that there's new legislation, it's going to make you sound super clever.
- LO 4.2 p.211

質問 2：
What is meant by Stakeholder Mapping? Describe a tool that can be used by a Procurement Professional to map the stakeholders at their organisation (25 points)
正解：
See the solution in Explanation part below.
Explanation:
How to approach this question:
- Define stakeholder mapping - completing an analysis of the stakeholders of an organisation and dividing them into categories depending on certain characteristics. This is often represented visually on a graph or matrix.
- Describe a Stakeholder mapping tool - the most common tool is Mendelow's Stakeholder Matrix so I would recommend using this one. It is explained in detail in the study guide. However, the question is open so you could choose to describe another tool such as Edgar's Stakeholder Position Analysis if you so wished. You wouldn't be wrong choosing this, but honestly, I'd just go for Mendelow. You can't go wrong with Mendelow. Because the Matrix has 4 sections you can imagine you'd get 5 points for the definition of stakeholder mapping, and 5 points for each of the quadrants of the matrix.
Essay Plan:
Introduction - The reason why stakeholder mapping is important is because interests and expectations of stakeholder groups will be different and possibly conflicting. Mapping this allows an organisation to see the variety and decide on an appropriate management style for each stakeholder group.
Paragraph 1 - Mendelow's Power / Interest Matrix maps stakeholders based on their influencing power and the strength of their motivation to use that power. It uses a 2x2 grid and defines power as high or low and interest and high or low. It then provides four strategies for managing the stakeholders based on which quadrant of the grid the stakeholder falls into. These 4 categories are:
Paragraph 2 - Keep satisfied - high power but low interest. If the stakeholder becomes dissatisfied or concerned their interest may peak. Examples include regulatory bodies, shareholders, senior management.
The best approach is to keep them up to date so they are informed of what is going on, but do not burden them with information they do not need.
Paragraph 3 - Manage Closely - AKA Key players - includes major customers, key suppliers, partners, senior management. These stakeholders need to know everything that is going on and approve of what is going on.
The recommended strategy is early involvement and participation, and integrating their goals with yours. This group requires regular communication and meetings. You should take their opinions on board.
Paragraph 4- Monitor - minimum effort required - this is the low priority group as they have low power and low interest. Includes small volume suppliers and other organisational functions with no direct interest in your activities. This group does not need to receive regular communication.
Paragraph 5 - Keep informed - high interest, but low power. If they're not kept in the loop and understand the need for decisions, they may lobby together to protect their interest if they feel threatened. Employee groups, suppliers and community groups may be in this category. This group should receive regular communication.
Conclusion - Mendelow created the matrix in 1991 and it is still used today. It is a popular management tool due to its simplicity. It's important to notes that stakeholders can move through the matrix- it isn't stagnant.
For example, at the beginning of a project a manager in another department may be classed as 'low priority' because they are seen to have no interest and no power in the project. However, as the project progresses the manager may become interested. They will then transfer into the keep informed category. Therefore, the matrix should be redone regularly throughout the lifetime of a project to capture any movements. The matrix should also be redone for each individual project - it cannot be assumed that a stakeholder who had interest in one project would be interested in another.
Tutor Notes
- The above essay plan is basically the entire essay, I got carried away. The only thing you'd need to add into that is an example of a stakeholder for each of the sections! (e.g. the CEO is high power, but low interest stakeholder for the procurement department. He/ She doesn't care about the day to day operations but should be kept informed of any big news). For your examples you could use your own place of work.
- At level 4 you don't have to analyse the model, you just have to be able to memorise it and repeat it.
Mendelow comes up again at Level 5 and 6 in a bit more detail. If you want to score super bonus points you could mention in your conclusion that the main disadvantage of Mendelow's Matrix is that it doesn't take into consideration the stakeholder's position on the project - whether they're for it or against it. Therefore, it doesn't provide the full picture or provide much help on how to manage stakeholders. E.g. two stakeholders might both be in 'manage closely' section, but one is for the project and the other against - they'd need to be handled very differently!
- Study guide p. 65

質問 3：
Explain FIVE ways conflicts of interest could be managed by effective corporate governance. (25 marks)
正解：
See the solution in Explanation part below.
Explanation:
Five Ways to Manage Conflicts of Interest Through Effective Corporate Governance Conflicts of interest arise when an individual or entity has competing personal and professional interests that could compromise their judgment or decision-making in business transactions. Effectivecorporate governanceensures that such conflicts are identified, managed, and mitigated to uphold transparency, integrity, and accountability within an organization. Below are five ways corporate governance can help manage conflicts of interest:
1. Establishing Clear Policies and Codes of Conduct
* Organizations should implementformal policiesthat outline what constitutes a conflict of interest and how employees and stakeholders should handle such situations.
* Effectiveness:
* Provides clear guidelines on ethical behavior.
* Ensures employees disclose conflicts before engaging in business transactions.
* Sets disciplinary actions for non-compliance.
2. Mandatory Disclosure of Interests
* Employees, board members, and executives should berequired to declare financial, personal, or business intereststhat may conflict with their duties.
* Effectiveness:
* Enhances transparency in procurement and business dealings.
* Prevents individuals from unduly influencing decisions for personal gain.
* Enables proactive identification of potential conflicts before they escalate.
3. Implementing Independent Oversight and Decision-Making Structures
* Establishing independent committees such asaudit, risk, and procurement committeesto oversee critical decision-making.
* Effectiveness:
* Ensures decisions are made objectively, reducing the risk of favoritism or unethical influence.
* Promotes accountability by having multiple parties involved in key transactions.
* Prevents a concentration of power in one individual or department.
4. Whistleblowing Mechanisms and Ethical Reporting Channels
* Organizations should provideanonymous reporting mechanismsfor employees to report unethical behavior or conflicts of interest.
* Effectiveness:
* Encourages a culture of transparency and ethical behavior.
* Protects whistleblowers from retaliation.
* Allows management to address conflicts before they result in financial or reputational damage.
5. Regular Audits and Compliance Monitoring
* Conducting periodicinternal and external auditsto detect and investigate potential conflicts of interest.
* Effectiveness:
* Helps identify patterns of unethical behavior.
* Ensures continuous improvement in governance practices.
* Reinforces a compliance-driven corporate culture.
Conclusion
By implementing these governance strategies, organizations can effectivelymanage conflicts of interest, reduce risks associated with unethical practices, and ensure decisions are made in the best interest of stakeholders. Effective corporate governance fosters trust, accountability, and long-term business sustainability.

質問 4：
Discuss the importance and role of an organisation's branding in procurement and supply operations (25 marks)
正解：
See the solution in Explanation part below.
Explanation:
How to approach the question
- This is a very open question so your essay could discuss
o the functions of a brand; e.g. advertising, marketing, creating trust, identity o What is effective branding? Strong image, convincing people to purchase, shared values with customers, offering a solution to a problem.
o The impact for procurement and supply chain isn't explained in the study guide so tailor this however you like. The best thing to do would be to think about some companies where branding is important, such as luxury goods, cars, or the brand is synonymous with a particular aspect such as Apple being associated with innovative technology. From there you could argue the importance of selecting the right suppliers to work with in order to keep up the brand image. Another example could be an ethical company needing to ensure their supply chain is 'clean', so as not to damage their branding. Possibilities are endless with this one.
Example Essay
In the contemporary business landscape, the significance of branding extends far beyond marketing and consumer perception. In procurement and supply operations, an organization's brand plays a pivotal role in shaping relationships with suppliers, determining the quality of goods and services that are procured, and influencing overall supply chain efficiency. This essay delves into the importance of branding in procurement and supply, exploring how a strong brand image can drive competitive advantage, foster trust and collaboration, and impact an organization's bottom line.
Building Competitive Advantage Through Brand Reputation:
The reputation of an organization's brand is a key determinant in attracting and retaining high-quality suppliers. A strong brand often correlates with financial stability, market presence, and business ethics, making such organizations more appealing to work with. This advantage is critical in procurement as it can lead to preferential treatment, such as priority access to scarce resources, better payment terms, and opportunities to collaborate on innovative products. For example, a well-regarded technology company might receive earlyaccess to cutting-edge components from suppliers eager to be associated with a market leader.
Enhancing Supplier Relationships and Negotiations:
Branding extends into the realms of trust and reliability, essential components in building long-term relationships with suppliers. A well-respected brand often implies a history of fair dealings, prompt payments, and mutual respect, which can make suppliers more willing to negotiate favourable terms. This trust can be particularly vital in times of supply chain disruptions or market volatility. Suppliers are more likely to extend credit or expedite orders for trusted partners, which can be invaluable for maintaining uninterrupted operations.
Influencing Quality and Sustainability Standards:
An organization's brand also communicates its commitment to quality and sustainability, which are increasingly crucial in procurement decisions. Suppliers aligning with brands that emphasize high-quality standards are often more diligent in maintaining these standards in their products and services. Additionally, a strong brand committed to sustainability can drive supply chain practices that align with environmental and social governance (ESG) principles. This commitment can lead to long-term cost savings, risk mitigation, and enhanced brand loyalty among environmentally conscious consumers.
Brand Image and Consumer Perception:
The procurement function directly impacts the final product quality, which in turn affects consumer perception of the brand. An organization's ability to procure high-quality, ethically sourced materials can significantly enhance its brand image and appeal to a broader customer base. For instance, a fashion brand's commitment to ethical sourcing and procurement of sustainable materials can bolster its image as an environmentally responsible brand, appealing to a growing demographic of eco-conscious consumers. The reverse is also true, brands associated with child or forced labour where this is found to be in their supply chains can suffer from loss of customers, revenue and reputation as well as potentially even legal consequences.
Internal Branding and Employee Engagement in Procurement:
Internal branding, the way an organization's values and culture are perceived by its employees, plays a crucial role in procurement. Employees who are proud of their organization's brand are more likely to engage deeply with their work, leading to better performance in procurement roles. This engagement can result in more innovative procurement strategies, improved vendor management, and a greater focus on aligning procurement practices with the organization's overall strategic goals.
Conclusion:
The role of an organization's branding in procurement and supply operations is deeply impactful. A strong brand can create competitive advantages, foster better supplier relationships, influence quality and sustainability standards, enhance consumer perception, and drive employee engagement. In the modern business world, where supply chains are complex and consumer expectations are high, branding is not just a marketing tool but a strategic asset in procurement and supply operations. Organizations that recognize and leverage the power of their brand within these operations are poised to achieve greater efficiency, sustainability, and overall success.
Tutor Notes
- This is a really random section of the study guide and doesn't really relate to the rest of the content.
Branding comes up on p.226 - 228. It therefore can come up as a question, but because it's such as small part of the syllabus, don't focus too much effort on this subject.
- If you remember one line from this topic it's this: "branding is not just a marketing tool but a strategic asset in procurement and supply operations"
- This type of question could come up as a scenario / case study. E.g. How does the branding of X Company impact upon their supply chain.