HACKER SAFEにより証明されたサイトは、99.9%以上のハッカー犯罪を防ぎます。
カート(0

PECB ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager 問題集

ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager

試験コード:ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager

試験名称:PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27005 Risk Manager

最近更新時間:2024-10-07

問題と解答:全62問

ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager 無料でデモをダウンロード:

PDF版 Demo ソフト版 Demo オンライン版 Demo

追加した商品:"PDF版"
価格: ¥6599 

無料問題集ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager 資格取得

質問 1:
Scenario 6: Productscape is a market research company headquartered in Brussels, Belgium. It helps organizations understand the needs and expectations of their customers and identify new business opportunities. Productscape's teams have extensive experience in marketing and business strategy and work with some of the best-known organizations in Europe. The industry in which Productscape operates requires effective risk management. Considering that Productscape has access to clients' confidential information, it is responsible for ensuring its security. As such, the company conducts regular risk assessments. The top management appointed Alex as the risk manager, who is responsible for monitoring the risk management process and treating information security risks.
The last risk assessment conducted was focused on information assets. The purpose of this risk assessment was to identify information security risks, understand their level, and take appropriate action to treat them in order to ensure the security of their systems. Alex established a team of three members to perform the risk assessment activities. Each team member was responsible for specific departments included in the risk assessment scope. The risk assessment provided valuable information to identify, understand, and mitigate the risks that Productscape faces.
Initially, the team identified potential risks based on the risk identification results. Prior to analyzing the identified risks, the risk acceptance criteria were established. The criteria for accepting the risks were determined based on Productscape's objectives, operations, and technology. The team created various risk scenarios and determined the likelihood of occurrence as "low," "medium," or "high." They decided that if the likelihood of occurrence for a risk scenario is determined as "low," no further action would be taken. On the other hand, if the likelihood of occurrence for a risk scenario is determined as "high" or "medium," additional controls will be implemented. Some information security risk scenarios defined by Productscape's team were as follows:
1. A cyber attacker exploits a security misconfiguration vulnerability of Productscape's website to launch an attack, which, in turn, could make the website unavailable to users.
2. A cyber attacker gains access to confidential information of clients and may threaten to make the information publicly available unless a ransom is paid.
3. An internal employee clicks on a link embedded in an email that redirects them to an unsecured website, installing a malware on the device.
The likelihood of occurrence for the first risk scenario was determined as "medium." One of the main reasons that such a risk could occur was the usage of default accounts and password. Attackers could exploit this vulnerability and launch a brute-force attack. Therefore, Productscape decided to start using an automated "build and deploy" process which would test the software on deploy and minimize the likelihood of such an incident from happening. However, the team made it clear that the implementation of this process would not eliminate the risk completely and that there was still a low possibility for this risk to occur. Productscape documented the remaining risk and decided to monitor it for changes.
The likelihood of occurrence for the second risk scenario was determined as "medium." Productscape decided to contract an IT company that would provide technical assistance and monitor the company's systems and networks in order to prevent such incidents from happening.
The likelihood of occurrence for the third risk scenario was determined as "high." Thus, Productscape decided to include phishing as a topic on their information security training sessions. In addition, Alex reviewed the controls of Annex A of ISO/IEC 27001 in order to determine the necessary controls for treating this risk. Alex decided to implement control A.8.23 Web filtering which would help the company to reduce the risk of accessing unsecure websites. Although security controls were implemented to treat the risk, the level of the residual risk still did not meet the risk acceptance criteria defined in the beginning of the risk assessment process. Since the cost of implementing additional controls was too high for the company, Productscape decided to accept the residual risk. Therefore, risk owners were assigned the responsibility of managing the residual risk.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
Which risk treatment option was used for the first risk scenario?
A. Risk avoidance
B. Risk modification
C. Risk sharing
正解:B
解説: (Topexam メンバーにのみ表示されます)

質問 2:
Can organizations obtain certification against ISO 31000?
A. Yes, organizations of any type or size can obtain certification against ISO 31000
B. Yes, but only organizations that manufacture products can obtain an ISO 31000 certification
C. [No, organizations cannot obtain certification against ISO 31000, as the standard provides only guidelines
正解:C
解説: (Topexam メンバーにのみ表示されます)

質問 3:
Which activity below is NOT included in the information security risk assessment process?
A. Prioritizing risks for risk treatment
B. Selecting information security risk treatment options
C. Determining the risk identification approach
正解:B
解説: (Topexam メンバーにのみ表示されます)

質問 4:
Which statement regarding information gathering techniques is correct?
A. Sending questionnaires to a group of people who represent the interested parties is NOT preferred
B. Interviews should be conducted only with individuals responsible for information security management
C. Organizations can utilize technical tools to identify technical vulnerabilities and compile a list of assets that influence risk assessment
正解:C
解説: (Topexam メンバーにのみ表示されます)

質問 5:
Scenario 6: Productscape is a market research company headquartered in Brussels, Belgium. It helps organizations understand the needs and expectations of their customers and identify new business opportunities. Productscape's teams have extensive experience in marketing and business strategy and work with some of the best-known organizations in Europe. The industry in which Productscape operates requires effective risk management. Considering that Productscape has access to clients' confidential information, it is responsible for ensuring its security. As such, the company conducts regular risk assessments. The top management appointed Alex as the risk manager, who is responsible for monitoring the risk management process and treating information security risks.
The last risk assessment conducted was focused on information assets. The purpose of this risk assessment was to identify information security risks, understand their level, and take appropriate action to treat them in order to ensure the security of their systems. Alex established a team of three members to perform the risk assessment activities. Each team member was responsible for specific departments included in the risk assessment scope. The risk assessment provided valuable information to identify, understand, and mitigate the risks that Productscape faces.
Initially, the team identified potential risks based on the risk identification results. Prior to analyzing the identified risks, the risk acceptance criteria were established. The criteria for accepting the risks were determined based on Productscape's objectives, operations, and technology. The team created various risk scenarios and determined the likelihood of occurrence as "low," "medium," or "high." They decided that if the likelihood of occurrence for a risk scenario is determined as "low," no further action would be taken. On the other hand, if the likelihood of occurrence for a risk scenario is determined as "high" or "medium," additional controls will be implemented. Some information security risk scenarios defined by Productscape's team were as follows:
1. A cyber attacker exploits a security misconfiguration vulnerability of Productscape's website to launch an attack, which, in turn, could make the website unavailable to users.
2. A cyber attacker gains access to confidential information of clients and may threaten to make the information publicly available unless a ransom is paid.
3. An internal employee clicks on a link embedded in an email that redirects them to an unsecured website, installing a malware on the device.
The likelihood of occurrence for the first risk scenario was determined as "medium." One of the main reasons that such a risk could occur was the usage of default accounts and password. Attackers could exploit this vulnerability and launch a brute-force attack. Therefore, Productscape decided to start using an automated "build and deploy" process which would test the software on deploy and minimize the likelihood of such an incident from happening. However, the team made it clear that the implementation of this process would not eliminate the risk completely and that there was still a low possibility for this risk to occur. Productscape documented the remaining risk and decided to monitor it for changes.
The likelihood of occurrence for the second risk scenario was determined as "medium." Productscape decided to contract an IT company that would provide technical assistance and monitor the company's systems and networks in order to prevent such incidents from happening.
The likelihood of occurrence for the third risk scenario was determined as "high." Thus, Productscape decided to include phishing as a topic on their information security training sessions. In addition, Alex reviewed the controls of Annex A of ISO/IEC 27001 in order to determine the necessary controls for treating this risk. Alex decided to implement control A.8.23 Web filtering which would help the company to reduce the risk of accessing unsecure websites. Although security controls were implemented to treat the risk, the level of the residual risk still did not meet the risk acceptance criteria defined in the beginning of the risk assessment process. Since the cost of implementing additional controls was too high for the company, Productscape decided to accept the residual risk. Therefore, risk owners were assigned the responsibility of managing the residual risk.
Based on scenario 6, Productscape decided to accept the residual risk and risk owners were assigned the responsibility of managing this risk.
Based on the guidelines of ISO/IEC 27005, is this acceptable?
A. No, the top management should manage the residual risk
B. Yes, risk owners must be aware of the residual risk and accept the responsibility for managing it
C. No, risk approvers are responsible for managing the residual risk after accepting it
正解:B
解説: (Topexam メンバーにのみ表示されます)

質問 6:
Scenario 7: Adstry is a business growth agency that specializes in digital marketing strategies. Adstry helps organizations redefine the relationships with their customers through innovative solutions. Adstry is headquartered in San Francisco and recently opened two new offices in New York. The structure of the company is organized into teams which are led by project managers. The project manager has the full power in any decision related to projects. The team members, on the other hand, report the project's progress to project managers.
Considering that data breaches and ad fraud are common threats in the current business environment, managing risks is essential for Adstry. When planning new projects, each project manager is responsible for ensuring that risks related to a particular project have been identified, assessed, and mitigated. This means that project managers have also the role of the risk manager in Adstry. Taking into account that Adstry heavily relies on technology to complete their projects, their risk assessment certainly involves identification of risks associated with the use of information technology. At the earliest stages of each project, the project manager communicates the risk assessment results to its team members.
Adstry uses a risk management software which helps the project team to detect new potential risks during each phase of the project. This way, team members are informed in a timely manner for the new potential risks and are able to respond to them accordingly. The project managers are responsible for ensuring that the information provided to the team members is communicated using an appropriate language so it can be understood by all of them.
In addition, the project manager may include external interested parties affected by the project in the risk communication. If the project manager decides to include interested parties, the risk communication is thoroughly prepared. The project manager firstly identifies the interested parties that should be informed and takes into account their concerns and possible conflicts that may arise due to risk communication. The risks are communicated to the identified interested parties while taking into consideration the confidentiality of Adstry's information and determining the level of detail that should be included in the risk communication. The project managers use the same risk management software for risk communication with external interested parties since it provides a consistent view of risks. For each project, the project manager arranges regular meetings with relevant interested parties of the project, they discuss the detected risks, their prioritization, and determine appropriate treatment solutions. The information taken from the risk management software and the results of these meetings are documented and are used for decision-making processes. In addition, the company uses a computerized documented information management system for the acquisition, classification, storage, and archiving of its documents.
Based on scenario 7, the risk management software is used to help Adstry's teams to detect new risks throughout all phases of the project. Is this necessary?
A. Yes, Adstry; should establish adequate procedures to monitor and review risks on a regular basis in order to identity the changes at an early stage
B. No. monitoring risks after a project is initiated will not provide important information that could impact Adstry'.s business objectives
C. Yes, according to ISO/IEC 27005, Adstry; must use an automated solution for identifying and analyzing risks related to information technology throughout all phases of a project
正解:A
解説: (Topexam メンバーにのみ表示されます)

弊社のPECB ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Managerを利用すれば試験に合格できます

弊社のPECB ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Managerは専門家たちが長年の経験を通して最新のシラバスに従って研究し出した勉強資料です。弊社はISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager問題集の質問と答えが間違いないのを保証いたします。

ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager無料ダウンロード

この問題集は過去のデータから分析して作成されて、カバー率が高くて、受験者としてのあなたを助けて時間とお金を節約して試験に合格する通過率を高めます。我々の問題集は的中率が高くて、100%の合格率を保証します。我々の高質量のPECB ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Managerを利用すれば、君は一回で試験に合格できます。

一年間の無料更新サービスを提供します

君が弊社のPECB ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Managerをご購入になってから、我々の承諾する一年間の更新サービスが無料で得られています。弊社の専門家たちは毎日更新状態を検査していますから、この一年間、更新されたら、弊社は更新されたPECB ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Managerをお客様のメールアドレスにお送りいたします。だから、お客様はいつもタイムリーに更新の通知を受けることができます。我々は購入した一年間でお客様がずっと最新版のPECB ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Managerを持っていることを保証します。

TopExamは君にISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Managerの問題集を提供して、あなたの試験への復習にヘルプを提供して、君に難しい専門知識を楽に勉強させます。TopExamは君の試験への合格を期待しています。

弊社は失敗したら全額で返金することを承諾します

我々は弊社のISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager問題集に自信を持っていますから、試験に失敗したら返金する承諾をします。我々のPECB ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Managerを利用して君は試験に合格できると信じています。もし試験に失敗したら、我々は君の支払ったお金を君に全額で返して、君の試験の失敗する経済損失を減少します。

安全的な支払方式を利用しています

Credit Cardは今まで全世界の一番安全の支払方式です。少数の手続きの費用かかる必要がありますとはいえ、保障があります。お客様の利益を保障するために、弊社のISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager問題集は全部Credit Cardで支払われることができます。

領収書について:社名入りの領収書が必要な場合、メールで社名に記入していただき送信してください。弊社はPDF版の領収書を提供いたします。

弊社は無料PECB ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Managerサンプルを提供します

お客様は問題集を購入する時、問題集の質量を心配するかもしれませんが、我々はこのことを解決するために、お客様に無料ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Managerサンプルを提供いたします。そうすると、お客様は購入する前にサンプルをダウンロードしてやってみることができます。君はこのISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager問題集は自分に適するかどうか判断して購入を決めることができます。

ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager試験ツール:あなたの訓練に便利をもたらすために、あなたは自分のペースによって複数のパソコンで設置できます。

PECB ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager 認定試験の出題範囲:

トピック出題範囲
トピック 1
  • Introduction to ISO
  • IEC 27005 and Risk Management: This part of the exam measures the expertise of professionals like Information Security Managers, Risk Managers, and IT Security Specialists. It covers the core concepts of risk management as defined by the ISO
  • IEC 27005 standard.
トピック 2
  • Risk Recording and Reporting, Monitoring and Review, and Risk Assessment Methods: This segment is tailored for Risk Managers, Compliance Officers, and Information Security Officers. It underscores the critical nature of documenting, monitoring, and reviewing risks to ensure the ongoing effectiveness of risk management processes.
トピック 3
  • Risk Assessment, Risk Treatment, and Risk Communication and Consultation Based on ISO
  • IEC 27005: This section tests the competencies of Security Analysts, IT Managers, and Risk Consultants in carrying out detailed risk assessments and treatment plans. The emphasis is on applying the ISO
  • IEC 27005 framework to identify, analyze, and assess risks, along with formulating effective risk treatment strategies.

参照:https://pecb.com/en/education-and-certification-for-individuals/iso-iec-27005/iso-iec-27005-risk-manager

連絡方法  
 [email protected] サポート

試用版をダウンロード

人気のベンダー
Apple
Avaya
CIW
FileMaker
Lotus
Lpi
OMG
SNIA
Symantec
XML Master
Zend-Technologies
The Open Group
H3C
3COM
ACI
すべてのベンダー
TopExam問題集を選ぶ理由は何でしょうか?
 品質保証TopExamは我々の専門家たちの努力によって、過去の試験のデータが分析されて、数年以来の研究を通して開発されて、多年の研究への整理で、的中率が高くて99%の通過率を保証することができます。
 一年間の無料アップデートTopExamは弊社の商品をご購入になったお客様に一年間の無料更新サービスを提供することができ、行き届いたアフターサービスを提供します。弊社は毎日更新の情況を検査していて、もし商品が更新されたら、お客様に最新版をお送りいたします。お客様はその一年でずっと最新版を持っているのを保証します。
 全額返金弊社の商品に自信を持っているから、失敗したら全額で返金することを保証します。弊社の商品でお客様は試験に合格できると信じていますとはいえ、不幸で試験に失敗する場合には、弊社はお客様の支払ったお金を全額で返金するのを承諾します。(全額返金)
 ご購入の前の試用TopExamは無料なサンプルを提供します。弊社の商品に疑問を持っているなら、無料サンプルを体験することができます。このサンプルの利用を通して、お客様は弊社の商品に自信を持って、安心で試験を準備することができます。