IBM C2180-188 問題集

弊社は無料IBM C2180-188サンプルを提供します

お客様は問題集を購入する時、問題集の質量を心配するかもしれませんが、我々はこのことを解決するために、お客様に無料C2180-188サンプルを提供いたします。そうすると、お客様は購入する前にサンプルをダウンロードしてやってみることができます。君はこのC2180-188問題集は自分に適するかどうか判断して購入を決めることができます。

C2180-188試験ツール：あなたの訓練に便利をもたらすために、あなたは自分のペースによって複数のパソコンで設置できます。

TopExamは君にC2180-188の問題集を提供して、あなたの試験への復習にヘルプを提供して、君に難しい専門知識を楽に勉強させます。TopExamは君の試験への合格を期待しています。

弊社のIBM C2180-188を利用すれば試験に合格できます

弊社のIBM C2180-188は専門家たちが長年の経験を通して最新のシラバスに従って研究し出した勉強資料です。弊社はC2180-188問題集の質問と答えが間違いないのを保証いたします。

この問題集は過去のデータから分析して作成されて、カバー率が高くて、受験者としてのあなたを助けて時間とお金を節約して試験に合格する通過率を高めます。我々の問題集は的中率が高くて、100％の合格率を保証します。我々の高質量のIBM C2180-188を利用すれば、君は一回で試験に合格できます。

安全的な支払方式を利用しています

Credit Cardは今まで全世界の一番安全の支払方式です。少数の手続きの費用かかる必要がありますとはいえ、保障があります。お客様の利益を保障するために、弊社のC2180-188問題集は全部Credit Cardで支払われることができます。

領収書について：社名入りの領収書が必要な場合、メールで社名に記入していただき送信してください。弊社はPDF版の領収書を提供いたします。

弊社は失敗したら全額で返金することを承諾します

我々は弊社のC2180-188問題集に自信を持っていますから、試験に失敗したら返金する承諾をします。我々のIBM C2180-188を利用して君は試験に合格できると信じています。もし試験に失敗したら、我々は君の支払ったお金を君に全額で返して、君の試験の失敗する経済損失を減少します。

一年間の無料更新サービスを提供します

君が弊社のIBM C2180-188をご購入になってから、我々の承諾する一年間の更新サービスが無料で得られています。弊社の専門家たちは毎日更新状態を検査していますから、この一年間、更新されたら、弊社は更新されたIBM C2180-188をお客様のメールアドレスにお送りいたします。だから、お客様はいつもタイムリーに更新の通知を受けることができます。我々は購入した一年間でお客様がずっと最新版のIBM C2180-188を持っていることを保証します。

IBM WebSphere Lombardi Edition V7.2, BPM Program Management 認定 C2180-188 試験問題:

1. The BPM Program Manager, Process Owner, and Lead Developer are collaborating to define the theme and assign user stories for the next iteration. The team is planning the 7th of 15 iterations in the Release Plan for Release One. The Program Manager displays a Team Velocity chart showing that the Development team has shown significant growth in story points accepted from iterations 1 to 4 and has been leveling off to roughly 200 story points in iterations 5 and 6.
Given there are 9 iterations remaining in the release plan, the Process Owner immediately recognizes there is room for roughly 1800 story points in the remaining time for Release One. However, the backlog contains 2400 story points marked as "high" priority and another 1200 story points marked as "medium" priority. The Process Owner asks to reduce the points assessed to the high priority user stories to bring the total points down to roughly 1800 so as to make them fit in the remaining time. The Program Manager agrees.
What is wrong with this scenario?

A) Team Velocity is fixed and changing the method of estimating story points mid-way through a release will not increase the scope of work that can be completed.
B) Process Owner forgot to include a risk factor of 1.4 that should be applied to 1800 resulting in roughly 2500 story points (1.4 x 1800 = 2520) remaining in the Release. No action should be taken.
C) This is a conversation for a Release Planning meeting and not during Iteration Planning.
D) Both "high" and "medium" priority stories should be included in the Release Plan meaning all user story points should be reduced by 50% to get all high/medium priority stories to fit in 1800 points remaining (2400+1200 = 3600 : 3600/2 = 1800).

2. A program manager is planning a project after Playback 0 with a customer. The first proposed plan includes releasing the process with no integrations to external systems. In this plan the process participants will key in data into the process application manually for the first release. The customer replies that this is not a good solution because the integrations are required. The customer proposes a second plan where all the integrations are built for the first release and it will take nearly 3 times as long to deliver with a duration of 9 months. After discussing the pros and cons of the different approaches the customer states that the plan with integrations will be less work and cost overall because they know that they will eventually build all the integrations. How should the program manager respond?

A) Continue to support the first plan because partial solutions that bring about an earlier release will often demonstrate that the full scope of initial planned integrations are not required.
B) Accept the customer's proposed plan as the customer has confirmed that the integrations will eventually be implemented. The program manager will document the integration risks.
C) Continue to support the first plan because it gives the process participants the ability to work with the data first hand and greatly reduce the user acceptance testing.
D) Accept the second plan because it will lock the customer into a much longer implementation during which the program manager can push for shorter releases.

3. The BPM Program Manager revises the project plan after Playback 0. The team has completed further analysis and definition of user stories with point estimates that were validated by both BPM Solution Architect and the user story owners. What is an appropriate level of confidence in the accuracy of this revised estimate at this stage in the project life cycle?

A) 60% - 80%
B) 55% - 65%
C) 80% or more
D) 40% or less

4. One week prior to the start of Iteration 5, which is planned for a two weeks duration, the BPM Program Manager has asked developers to review the proposed user stories assigned to the iteration, define implementation tasks and provide estimates in hours. During the commitment meeting prior to iteration start, one of the user stories has a single implementation task with an estimate of 80 hours. What should the BPM Program Manager recommend?

A) Cancel the user story and move it to a future iteration because 80 hours too large to fit into a two-week iteration with confidence.
B) Break down the implementation work into tasks that can be described in 8 hours or less.
C) Break down the user story into child stories because it is an epic.
D) Pad the task with 20% more hours because developers typically under-estimate their required effort.

質問と回答：